Creationist claims carbon dating jim currens on dating sites
Creationists keep saying things like this, "How about the massive global carbon and coal deposits which render carbon dating inaccurate?
" "Carbon dating can't prove anything is more than a few thousand years old."Could someone debunk this and explain how carbon dating works.
They lie, twist and misrepresent the facts about radiometric dating (and wholly ignore the many other corroborating methods) that tell us the actual age of organic materials to preserve their foundational fantasy at all costs.
You'd expect to find 100 grams of element A in a sample if it was brand new.
If you find 50 grams, the sample must be about 250 years old.
And there isn't a shred of evidence to discount the validity of our current understanding of radioactive decay.
Actually you can go back about 50,000 years, the further back the greater the error because the less the amount of C14 left.